General Kiyani Can Never Be Dictated By USA To Attack North Waziristan

Pakistan's Army Chief General Kiyani is not a politician that on a phone call from a G-22 officer of USA will start attacking NW and killing innocent people( may be a few terrorists). He is a soldier who sacrifices his life for the safety and security of the country. He is the chief of world's best trained, brave and patriotic solders. USA should remain within its limits, when our brave Chief will deem suitable in the larger interest of the nation he would take step. But never on the requests or warnings or orders of the USA. Whole Nation stands shoulder to shoulder to him on this issue not with the coward and weak politicians. We have no concerns whether NATO forces are being defeated by Taliban and they want to flee soon or they stay longer in Afghanistan to be killed by Taliban. Are Americans not satisfied with daily Drone attacks and killing hundreds of women , children and other unarmed people.?
Though USA newspapers are wrongly reporting and creating misunderstandings every day about the operation in NW. As a major US newspaper reports that Pakistan Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani was singled out for resisting Obama administration's pressures to launch a ground assault against Afghan Taliban and al-Qaeda sanctuaries in Nort Waziristan, now a principal American demand. "Recent U.S. intelligence estimates have concluded that he (Gen. Kayani) is unlikely to change his mind anytime soon," The Washington Post said in a dispatch, reported: 'Pakistan's top general vexes US'. "Despite the entreaties, Kayani doesn't trust U.S. motivations and is hedging his bets in case the American strategy for Afghanistan fails," the newspaper said, citing American officials. Noting that Kayani is viewed as the most powerful man in Pakistan, the newspaper said the US has "yet to persuade him to undertake what its strategy review concluded is a key to success in the Afghan war, the elimination of heavens inside Pakistan where the Taliban plots and stages attacks on coalition troops in Afghanistan." In a joint dispatch, The Washington Post staff writers, Karin Brulliard and Karen DeYoung, wrote: "Kayani, who has more direct say over the country's security strategy than its president or prime minister, has resisted personal appeals from President (Barrack) Obama, U.S. military commanders and senior diplomats. Recent U.S. intelligence estimates have concluded that he is unlikely to change his mind anytime soon. "In many ways, Kayani is the personification of the vexing problem posed by Pakistan. Like the influential military establishment he represents, he views Afghanistan on a timeline stretching far beyond the U.S. withdrawal, which is slated to begin this summer. While the Obama administration sees the insurgents as an enemy force to be defeated as quickly and directly as possible, Pakistan has long regarded them as useful proxies in protecting its western flank from inroads by India, its historical adversary.
'Kayani wants to talk about the end state in South Asia,' said one of several Obama administration officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity about the sensitive relationship. U.S. generals, the official said, 'want to talk about the next drone attacks.'